1. Mission Statement:
Our mission is to empower socially responsible citizens for the global community.


2. School Context:

Grades: Preschool, Kindergarten-Gr. 5, Special Education (MMH)
School Capacity: 530
Enrollment on Sep 30, 2007: 367
Teacher F.T.E.: 22.4, Counsellor .2, Librarian .4, ESL 1.0, ESL TA 1.0, First Nations .2,
LA Teacher 1.0, LA TA 1.0, Learning and Assessment Center 1.0, Special Education
Teacher 1.0, Music .4, Academic Support TA 1.0, Support TAs 1.0
Aboriginal students make up 12% of our school population, and 28% of our students
are ESL.
Also, we are an identified Greater Needs school, in which 32% of this year’s Kindergarten students fell in the lowest 10%ile for physical health and well-being, the 4th lowest in the district.
Diverse in its population and rich in its programs Ten-Broeck addresses the needs of all of its students. Some of these are:
Since we are a Lion’s Quest school we subscribe to the philosophy of the Quest program that includes: Positive Pals values, social responsibility, communication, decision making, and goal setting. In addition, we also have a Self-Managers Program designed to promote and reward students positive, self-guided behaviour.
We have a very successful school-wide anti-bullying program. This year marked our 12
th year of the implementation and training in our school.
We fully subscribe to the visual and performing arts, Kindergarten through Grade 5. We offer intra-curricular classes in Orph, choir and recorders. In addition, we present a major musical every other spring at Abbey Arts Center. To date Ten-Broeck has presented six major musicals. Our next scheduled musical will be held in 2009.
We have a fully organized Accelerated Reading Library. This is the 5
th year using the A.R. program and our reading scores reflect its success. We are the first school in the district to acquire the on-line version of Accelerated Reader, which gives our students access to the entire Accelerated Reader library. For four consecutive years we have had students participate in the Red Cedar Book Awards Reading Program.
The school also houses one of the district’s Learning and Assessment Centres and offers specialized assistance to students in our family of schools.
We are associated with the John MacLure Community School and offer many after-school recreational programs for the children in our catchment area.
We are also pleased to be offering, the 5
th year, a preschool literacy program at Ten-Broeck called “Neighborhood Place”. This program encourages parents and tots to attend a structured setting that focuses on literacy, art and socialization. Many of these students enter our full-time Kindergarten program.


3. Leadership/Teamwork:

Teachers/staff regularly offer workshops to other members of staff on such things as Integrating Technology, Math Makes Sense, Accelerated Reading, Report Writer and The Developing Writer programs. This administration promotes dialogue with staff at S.B.T. meeting, staff meetings and informal settings. These on-going discussions with teachers formulate plans and strategies that address student achievement. In addition, a PLC was formed in 2007-2008 under the leadership of the school’s Student Achievement Facilitator. This group of 8 teachers has investigated instructional techniques in language arts, with a specific focus on writing and the new oral language PLO’s.
Leadership for the school plan is jointly shared between the SPC and the school staff. The principal, vice-principal, facilitator of the school’s PLC, and the parent representatives on the SPC are key leaders in the process.


4. Communication:

We have shared our goals with the public through our bi-monthly newsletters, P.A.C. meetings, and S.P.C. meetings. In addition, we have our goals clearly presented in each classroom and in the general public area of our school, as well as our website. www.sd34.bc.ca/schools/tenbroeck/

5. Goal and Objective(s):

5.1 Goal:

To improve literacy skills across the curriculum, with particular emphasis on students falling in the lower 20% of the school population.

5.2 Rationale for the Goal:

We realize that supports need to be put in place to help students achieve greater success across the curriculum. In 2007, only 49% of our Gr. 1 students were meeting or exceeding PM Benchmark standards for their grade. 85% of the Grade Two students met this standard, and 69% of the Gr. 3’s did likewise. In all three Primary Grades, the boys reading level was below the girls (by 3 to 14%), and ESL students read at a lower level than the overall group average (by 13 to 19%). In the Gr. 3 writing assessment, 41% of the students met or exceeded grade level standards, with weaknesses similar to the reading results indicated by boys and ESL students
On the FSA assessments, 70% of our Grade Four students met or exceeded grade level standards in reading, and 94% of them met that standard in writing. Regarding gender differences, in most years since 2002, the boys have scored slightly lower than the girls in FSA Reading (avg. 4% lower), with a greater gap displayed in FSA Writing (avg. 10%). Differences in Aboriginal vs. Non-Aboriginal students have been inconclusive, as have differences between ESL students vs. the group average.
According to the school’s own year-end assessment, using the summative performance statements for each grade, results varied from a low of 83% meeting or exceeding expectations in language arts to a high of 98%. The school wide-write assessment in the fall of 2007 indicated that 45 % of the school population (Grs. 1-5) fully met or exceeded grade level standards.

5.3 Objectives:

Students will:
• demonstrate increases in reading fluency and comprehension in all genres of fiction and non-fiction
• demonstrate increased writing ability, according to the BC Performance Standards.


5.4 Performance Indicators:

Cohort groups in the primary grades have exhibited very similar performance over the last 4 years, and therefore we can safely set grade-specific targets that meet the needs of both the cohort groups and the year over year conditions in the school.

District Reading Assessment:
Gr. 1 % mtg./exceeding
2009 Target, all students - 65%
2009 Target, boys - 55%
2009 Target, ESL - 55%

Gr. 2 % mtg./exceeding
2009 Target, all students - 80%
2009 Target, boys - 75%
2009 Target, ESL - 65%

Gr. 3 % mtg./exceeding
2009 Target, all students - 80%
2009 Target, boys - 75%
2009 Target, ESL - 65%

On a long-term basis, we would expect the above percentages to increase slightly, particularly if we are successful in increasing the performance of certain key sub-groups (boys, ESL students).

District Writing Assessment:
Gr. 3 % mtg./exceeding
2009 Target, all students - 55%
2009 Target, boys - 40%
2009 Target, ESL - 30%

Provincial FSA:
Gr. 4 % Reading Comprehension mtg./exceeding
2009 Target, all Gr. 4’s - 75%
2009 Target, boys - 70%
2009 Target, ESL - 60%

Gr. 4 % Writing mtg./exceeding
2009 Target, all Gr. 4’s - 90%
2009 Target, boys - 85%
2009 Target, ESL - 80%

School Assessments:
Wide Write, % meeting/exceeding
2009 Target, all students - 55%
Long-Term Target - 60%
Year-End Summative Report, Language Arts
2009 Target, Primary students, % meeting/exceeding - 90%
2009 Target, Intermediate students, % C+ or higher - 80%


5.5 Actions:

Structures
• LA Teaching Assistant will be acquired to target and work with lower achieving students, particularly primary students.
• Money will be set aside for the acquisition of new resources to support guided reading for all students.
• The school will explore ways to re-organize the delivery of remedial services to students (Learning Assistance and ESL) so that it causes the least interruption of regular classroom practice and provides flexibility.
• The school will investigate rescheduling prep/release time in order to provide teachers time for collaborative grade group planning
• Each student in grades 1-3 will participate in guided reading lessons for a minimum of twice per week, and a minimum of three times per week for students in the lowest 20%.
• Each student will participate in independent silent reading for at least 15 minutes each day.
• Each student will participate in writing activities as outlined by the district’s Developing Writing Program.
• L.S.T. teacher and Aide will provide literacy support for bottom 20% of Gr. 1 to 5 (guided reading, writing, letter-sound recognition, sight words)
• Full-Day Kindergarten classes that support the at-risk ESL and FN students’ early language development, using programs like Talking Tables, Headsprout, and Guided Reading.

Strategies
• Teachers will ensure that students participate in Successmaker sessions
• Teachers will provide guided reading lessons for students in Grades 1-3 for a minimum of twice per week
• Teachers will utilize lessons from the Developing Writer binder
• Teachers will use lessons in reading from the Reading 44 resource
• Teachers will use the BC Performance Standards to inform and assess student writing
• The teachers will hold a school-wide write once per term (October, Feb., May)
• Teachers will teach non-fiction reading strategies
• Teachers will attend workshops based on the literacy goal
• Teachers will make use of the Accelerated Reader program as a motivational tool for reading and to monitor students’ reading progress
• Teachers will make use of the Home Reading program as a motivational tool for reading and to encourage home-school cooperation
• Each term, staff will present certificates to those students who met their AR goals
• Teachers will incorporate Adrienne Gear’s Reading Power strategies to improve reading comprehension
• Teachers will utilize grade-group collaborative time to clarify essential outcomes, create formative assessments, alter instructional practices, and monitor student progress , particularly in regards to language arts instruction and the performance of male and ESL students



5.6 Results – Progress towards Targets:

District Reading Assessment:
Gr. 1 % fully mtg/exceeding
2004 - 63%
2005 - 56%
2006 - 65%
2007 - 49%

Gr. 2 % fully mtg/exceeding
2004 - 89%
2005 - 77%
2006 - 83%
2007 - 85%

Gr. 3 % fully mtg/exceeding
2004 - 87%
2005 - 80%
2006 - 74%
2007 - 69%

District Writing Assessment:
Gr. 3 % fully mtg./exceeding
2004 - 46%
2005 - 43%
2006 - 54%
2007 - 41%

Provincial FSA:
Gr. 4 % Reading Comprehension mtg/exceeding
2002 - 76%
2003 - 75%
2004 - 77%
2005 - 80%
2006 - 65%
2007 - 70%

Gr. 4 % Writing mtg./exceeding
2002 - 90%
2003 - 94%
2004 - 94%
2005 - 96%
2006 - 86%
2007 - 94%

School Assessments:
School-Wide Write, % fully mtg/exceeding
2007, all students (Grs. 1-5) - 45%
Year-End Summative Report, Language Arts, % meeting/exceeding
2007, Gr. 1 students - 83%
2007, Gr. 2 students - 89%
2007, Gr. 3 students - 96%
Year-End Summative Report, Language Arts, % C+ or higher
2007, Gr. 4 students - 79%
2007, Gr. 5 students - 75%